The Ethics of Faking a DJ Set: A Call for Understanding Over Judgment
Taking a look back, the art of DJing analysis, what’s at stake, judgement vs. understanding, and the path forward are all part of the equation when it comes to an authentic DJ set.
By: Mike Garrett AKA DJ Mike Host Of 2 DJs 1 Mic
The world of DJing has always been built on authenticity, creativity, and an undeniable connection between the artist and the audience. But what happens when a DJ fakes their set? This question recently caught my attention when I came across a video on Facebook. The clip showcased a DJ performing at a festival, going through all the motions of mixing live, but in reality, they weren’t actually faking their DJ performance. The reactions in the comment section were numerous, varied, and deeply passionate.
I deliberately avoid categorizing these reactions as positive or negative because, truthfully, I have mixed emotions about this myself. Instead, I want to explore the broader implications of this debate, not only from the perspective of DJs but also from an industry wide and cultural standpoint.
A Look Back: Is It Really New?
Reflecting on my childhood in the 1980s, I remember watching Soul Train and other music shows where artists would perform via lip-syncing. The realization that many of my favorite musicians weren’t actually singing live left me surprised, even a little disappointed. Yet, over time, I, like many others, accepted this as part of the entertainment industry. The question remains: does that make it right or wrong?
This comparison is relevant because, much like lip-syncing in concerts, faking a DJ set raises similar ethical and artistic questions. If an artist’s primary role is to entertain, does it truly matter if they are performing live or simply presenting a pre-recorded set in the most engaging way possible?
The Art of DJing: What’s at Stake?
Seeing that video of a DJ “performing” to thousands of people but not actually mixing in real-time made me think about deeper issues within the DJ community. One of the persistent challenges in this industry is the lack of mutual support and understanding among DJs. Many of us have, at some point, adopted a selfish approach focusing solely on our individual success rather than uplifting the craft as a whole.
This incident also forced me to consider the different reasons a DJ might choose or be required to fake a set. Some of these include:
Technical Precision: Some major events rely on perfectly timed lighting, pyrotechnics, and visuals that sync seamlessly with the music. A live mix, with all its potential human errors, might not align perfectly with these elements.
Event Requirements: The organizers or sponsors of a festival might request a pre-recorded set to ensure no technical difficulties arise.
Brand Image: Some DJs, especially those known for producing electronic music, might focus on curating an experience rather than displaying mixing skills.
Performance Anxiety or Fatigue: Even the most skilled DJs can have an off night. A pre-recorded set can serve as a safety net.
Does this make it right or wrong? The answer isn’t as straightforward as we might think. For some, the idea of faking a set feels like an act of deception, undermining the skill and authenticity that define DJ culture. For others, it’s simply a necessary adaptation to the modern demands of large-scale performances.
Judgment vs. Understanding
One of the biggest problems in our industry and society as a whole is the rush to judge before seeking to understand. Instead of immediately discrediting a DJ for faking a set, why not ask why they did it? What circumstances led to that decision? Is their talent in question, or is it just a different approach to performance?
Many of us will stand firmly against pre-recorded sets, arguing that DJing is an art form that should be executed live, complete with its imperfections. To us, faking a set is unacceptable. But others might recognize the evolving nature of entertainment and acknowledge that, sometimes, different circumstances call for different methods.
This conversation extends beyond DJing. We readily accept lip-synced performances from musicians, even knowing that live vocals can be unpredictable. We embrace studio-enhanced recordings of our favorite artists because they deliver the most polished version of a song. If we can accept these aspects of the music industry, can we at least consider that DJing might operate under similar conditions at times?
The Path Forward: Choosing Positivity
The next time we encounter something that challenges our expectations, whether it’s a DJ faking a set or another deviation from our perception of authenticity, let’s choose understanding over judgment. Instead of immediately assuming deception, let’s ask questions, seek clarity, and try to see the bigger picture.
A positive approach fosters a healthier mindset, not just within the DJ community but in life as a whole. Positivity leads to growth, collaboration, and a greater sense of unity. Negativity, on the other hand, often results in unnecessary division and conflict. In an industry where DJs already face countless challenges competition, burnout, and constantly evolving technology we should aim to build each other up rather than tear each other down.
Final Thoughts
At the end of the day, it doesn’t cost us anything to be open-minded. Understanding another person’s choices doesn’t mean we have to agree with them, but it does mean we’re willing to see beyond our own biases. If a DJ fakes a set, it doesn’t necessarily mean they lack skill or integrity it could be a requirement of the performance, a strategic decision, or simply the way they choose to present their art.
So the next time you see something that doesn’t sit right with you, take a step back. Ask yourself: Do I truly understand the situation, or am I making assumptions? Approach it with curiosity rather than condemnation. Because in the end, fostering understanding is far more valuable than rushing to judgment